翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Cook ・ R v Coote ・ R v Coulson, Brooks and others ・ R v Creighton ・ R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd ・ R v Cuerrier ・ R v Cunningham ・ R v Darrach ・ R v Daviault ・ R v Davidson ・ R v Davis ・ R v DB ・ R v Dear ・ R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union ・ R v Dersch ・ R v DeSousa ・ R v District Auditor No 3 Audit District of West Yorkshire MCC, ex p West Yorkshire MCC ・ R v Dixon ・ R v Drybones ・ R v Du Plessis ・ R v Duarte ・ R v Dudley and Stephens ・ R v Dyment ・ R v Dytham ・ R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co ・ R v Edwards Books and Art Ltd ・ R v Evans ・ R v Ewanchuk ・ R v Faulkner ・ R v Fearon Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v DeSousa ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v DeSousa ''R v DeSousa'' () 2 S.C.R. 944, is the Supreme Court of Canada case where the Court determined the Constitutionally required level for mens rea for the charge of "unlawfully causing bodily harm". The case is one of a series of cases including ''R. v. Hundal'' and ''R. v. Creighton'' where the Court reduced the requirement for culpability for a number of crimes. == Background == Shortly before midnight, during a New Year party in Toronto on December 31, 1987, a fight broke out. Several people started throwing bottles including Joao DeSousa who threw a bottle that ricocheted off the wall and hit Teresa Santos in the forearm causing serious harm. DeSousa was charged with unlawfully causing bodily harm contrary to s.269 of the Criminal Code. The issue before the Court was whether s.269 of the Criminal Code violated the s.7 of the Charter as it potentially allowed for prison sentences for "Absolute Liability" offences (which was deemed unconstitutional in ''Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act''). 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v DeSousa」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.